Hall vote set to close; ’00 repeat?

Posted by hobsonschoice1 on April 20, 2011 – 12:43 pm

A few hits in the hurry-up offense:

» Voting for the 10 finalists for the Hall of Fame ends 12 a.m. Thursday. We won’t deliver the results until after the April 28-30 NFL Draft. There is a lot ground to make up for the other 21 candidates trying to break into the top 10. Career scoring leader Jim Breech was holding down the 10th spot by appearing on 49.7 percent of the ballots. Tight end Bob Trumpy at 44.8 and head coach Forrest Gregg at 39.4 were 11-12.

» Published reports are saying Georgia wide receiver A.J. Green is visiting Paul Brown Stadium on Wednesday, a player that many, if not most, mock drafts ticket to the Bengals at No. 4.

So on top of quarterback Jordan Palmer’s assertion this week that the working assumption is wide receivers Chad Ochocinco and Terrell Owens are not coming back, it gets someone thinking.

The last time the Bengals took a receiver with the fourth pick was April 15, 2000 when they tabbed Florida State’s Peter Warrick and a few days later cut their all-time leading receiver, Carl Pickens. Yes, The Ocho is now their career leader, but they can’t cut him during the lockout and if they do want to move him (despite Marvin Lewis’ frequent roasts they still haven’t said) they would prefer to trade him.

Just for the heck of it, the inaugural Hall of Fame class had two first-rounders (Anthony Muñoz, Isaac Curtis), a second-rounder (Boomer Esiason), and a third-rounder (Ken Anderson). Of the top three vote-getters so far for this class, Tim Krumrie was a 10th-rounder, James Brooks was a first-rounder and wide receiver Cris Collinsworth was a second-rounder, although Brooks was obtained in a trade.

By the way, when his time comes The Ocho is a first-ballot Hall of Famer. Maybe Pickens would have put up his numbers if he had Carson Palmer and The Ocho would have had Pickens’ numbers if he had Esiason at the end and Klingler and Akili at the beginning. But this isn’t the Sci-Fi Channel. That’s not what happened.

» Sports Illustrated‘s Peter King tweeted Wednesday he sees at least six quarterbacks in the first 49 picks and maybe seven. Let’s see. That’s Newton, Gabbert, Mallett, Locker, Ponder, Dalton and Kaepernick has to be the seventh. Everyone seems to think he’s No. 7 and that Newton is No. 1 and Gabbert is No. 2. After that, it seems to be the eye of the beholder.

Published reports have Bengals offensive coordinator Jay Gruden all over Dalton but some teams wonder about his arm strength. The Bengals have said they like Mallett’s rocket arm, but how they’ve computed it into a grade against his lack of mobility and off-field issues is anyone’s guess. As in, would they take any of the seven if they’re there at No. 35? Or would it have to be a select few or one? Given they’re taking Carson Palmer’s trade-me-or-mothball-me demand seriously, would they even take Kaepernick at No. 35? Even though he’s very raw and is coming out of something called the Pistol Offense and maybe couldn’t help you for two years?

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Hobson's Choice | 2 Comments »

2 Responses to “Hall vote set to close; ’00 repeat?”

  1. By kaptkurt on Apr 21, 2011 | Reply

    i like the top three and think they are all deserving candidates. I also think Pickens should get in ….someday. I think Ocho, TJ and Collinsworth all need to be there first. I also think kickers and coaches should be five or six years away due to the number of other players deserving it more. The only coach I see in the Hall of Fame would be the Superbowl WINNING coach at this point. As far as the QB in the draft, if one of the seven is around in the third round, take him. I like AJ Green or Von Miller at #4 and the player Mel Kiper can’t understand why he’s still out there at #35.

  2. By bengals8 on Apr 21, 2011 | Reply

    I know some may ridicule me for this question, but why is no one talking about Jordan Palmer as a possibility for next year? Looking at the draft class for this year, Jordan has better physical attributes than everyone on the board (Mallett also has a strong arm). In addition, he’s been a pro for several years, while any rookie on the board would be well behind getting up to speed in a lockout year. I’m not saying its a definite answer, but Jordan seems like potentially a better possibility than a lot of the guys on the board who we might draft.

You must be logged in to post a comment.